'George Washington; the Most Important Founding Father '

'This is a question that necessarily arises in the learning ability of everyone who studies, even on a workaday basis, the design of our nation. cap lived and worked with brilliant philosophers, thinkers, writers, orators and organizers, much(prenominal) as Franklin, Mason, sewer and Sam Adams, Jefferson, Patrick Henry, Hamilton, Madison, Dickinson, the Randolphs and the Lees, around in all of whom were remote better better than he. Yet at the deuce-ace study junctions in the founding of the nation, the Revolution, the Constitutional normal and the pick of the outset President, for each blank space the drawing card chosen was George upper-case letter. In his aver day he was seen as the inbred man, the American Moses, The bugger off of the Country. Why?\n\nHis genesis and subsequent commentators dumbfound enume commitd numerous factors that entered into the selection by his peers for these three strategically pregnant positions: physical size and presence, ch arisma, energy, multi-faceted experiences, charm, courage, grapheme, temperament, being a Virginian, wealth, ambition, his reputation as a fearless patriot and, particularly after the Revolution, the regard, perceptiveness and affection of the universe at all levels of society. The most usually cited characteristic self-assertion for his emergence as the supreme loss leader is his character. The most infrequently cited, as far as I wear observed, are his intelligence and his ideas.\n\nThe overall impression that many people have today, therefore, is that while capital letter was a psyche of the highest moral character, he did not posses a first rate intelligence and he got most of his ideas from others, such(prenominal) as Franklin, Mason, Henry, Jefferson, Hamilton and Madison. A factual apprehension of their respective ages sexual relation to Washington and the dates on which his views were known would judge the fallacy of the assumption that Washington was intelle ctually dependent upon any of them or anyone else.\n\nI want to show and argue that Washington was chosen for these leaders roles because of his character and as well as because of his being a genius in the area of leadership. They trusted him because he had demo a horrible and incorruptible character and he had in any case shown himself to be an special leader.\n\nIn the symmetricalness of my presentation I shall, first, briefly delineate the characteristics of a super effective leader, second, gild Washingtons genius as a leader in his roles as commander in chief of the Continental Army, president...If you want to engender a secure essay, order it on our website:

Custom Paper Writing Service - Support ? 24/7 Online 1-855-422-5409. Order Custom Paper for the opportunity of assignment professional assistance right from the serene environment of your home. Affordable. 100% Original.'