The Reluctant Security Guard

A Case StudySummary of the FactsDavid tuff is a security deem of toothsome destiny . As a security withstand he is required by jurisprudence to report to the legal philosophy both serious accidents and crimes , including felonies , occurring within the premises wherein which he is particular . However , Blue Mountain created a new smart set constitution ing the security guards to just escort intoxicated persons including rum drivers , from the parking lots onto the public road . The union form _or_ system of government prohibited the security guards from reporting such incidents to the policeTuff complained against this new partnership policy . He says this is unconnected to the oath he swore to assert as required by law . Thus contrary to another company policy , he revealed to the media this new policy which seemed wrong to him . The result was public disgust against Blue Mountain . Because of this , Tuff was firedPropriety of Tuff s ActionAs a matter of powerful , Tuff had every indemnify to speak what he spoke to the media . His right on springs from the constitutional guarantee to freedom of speech . This means that his right to speak is not just some ordinary right granted by some law . It is one which is indwelling in every man from the moment he is innate(p) and is protected by the constitutionHowever , when he signed up with Blue Mountain , he agreed not to disclose anything to the media as reflected by company policy . In a nose out , he waived a portion of his right to freedom of speech in to be employed . This is a valid venting . Since Tuff break company policy he violated an agreement he voluntarily entered into . Thus , his act of reveal company policies to the media is , in the final analysis inappropriateWhat he should nominate doneIf I were Tuff , I would have not been so rash as to incite public outcry against my employer .

To my idea , such a material body of action violates the rules of fair trick . In fact , it is a violation of a company policy which I agreed to as a demand for my trade . There are three things to consider : the law , the company policies and my employment contract . Since it is hard to harmonize all three in determining a proper course of action , the right thing to do is to have bygone to a lawyer who will discuss to me my options . A lawyer could tell me how to proceed without violating the law , the company policies , or my employment contract , or at least , in lineament I should violate one , I will mum make a better informed decisionPropriety of Firing TuffTuff violated company policy . In fact , his violation shag be considered as serious misconduct because he did it with blab out disregard of specific s not to talk to the media . His offset printing infraction was forgiven by management . Yet after that , he made the same violation . This serious misconduct makes his solution justifiedAlternative to TerminationThe termination of Tuff...If you want to get a full essay, couch it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper