through with(predicate) the help, and imaginative mind of Professor Thomas Kerr, he helped me pick up that every art piece is worth its weight. Throughout the lecture, he showed us various art pieces throughout different clock of history, yet they all had one major thing in common. That thing is that these pieces have a subliminal message almost, or a meaning that is not outwardly portrayed. What I mean by this is that for example, in one painting a muliebrity was holding a flower, a symbol of fertility, the man held a sword, a common phallic symbol, and in between the two, was a child- the product of the two. Not many people would know that unless creation a prominent art aficionado, and I for sure did not until it was pointed out.
Little things like that interest me more and more into the nice world of photography, paintings, sculptures, etc.
One question I would ask is what get going of the lecture interested the audience most? The photography presentation or that of Professor Kerr?
I would ask this question in general because although both lectures fall into the category of art in raw(a) York City, they seemed very much different. Belenna Lauto delivered the first portion of the presentation and centre mostly on photography. Being a distinguished photographer her self, she shared with us many of her personal works as well as her favorites and those that she felt were eye catching and powerful. I extremely...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment