Case response Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 3

Response - Case Study manikinChens cringe is also running and offers him autonomy over operations in mainland China and while he is willing to corporate with Denver on the required changes, he demands that change in his responsibility will need to be defined and Mia comfort has to decide on an action (Bartlett 1- 13).Foster has many options to consider but she should redefine Chens roles through a new contract and through mutual agreement with Chen. This is because of such factors as Chens willingness to work with the company, Chens commitment to mastery of the company, implications of Chens contract, demonstrated ability of Chen to ensure success of the stage business in China, and management competency of Chen to sustain the modern stage of the companys ingathering in China.Chen states that he is willing to continue working with the company, even after expiry of his current contract and this means a dedicated employee who should be retained, especially for his recognized out put and to reduce manageable costs of recruiting and training a new personnel, which may be a recurrent activity should a suitable replacement be hard to find. The fact that Chen has successfully spearheaded Levendary cafs expansion chess opening also shows his commitment to the companys goals and makes him an ideal asset. Denvers office may non be comfortable with his initiatives but he implements these for the best interest of the organization and victimizing him for this would be unfair. With the realized success in China, noting that the company is almost breaking even in the region, Chen is likely to promote sustainability of Levendary in the region or in any other region and he should therefore not be forced out of the company. Chens contract also grants him autonomy and this means that restricting his representation is a breach of contract. This entitles him to resign and take legal actions against the company and while apparent implications could