.

Thursday, 26 December 2013

Branzburg V Hayes, Confidentiality, And Shield Laws

Branzburg v hay, Confidentiality, and Shield Laws A citizen walking the streets of New York, low a dark alley, in a not so popular area ensurees a implementation. The next day, the citizen hears about the read on the local discussion station. Later the citizen hears on the radio receiver that the silent witness program is offering an award for either matchless who witnessed the murder which occurred in the same area on the same night that the witness was walking down the street. The citizen decides to have it away forward and support details to the police regarding what he or she witnessed the night in question. A few days later, the suspect is caught based on the witness account of events. The witness is asked to communicate in judicature but refuses because he or she believes avenging will briefly follow from identifying the murderer. The witness is subpoenaed by the courts to testify. Should the witness have to testify? This is the question posed to many diarists when asked to append the point of reference of their contemporary news story. Many journalists believe that they should be granted privilege when asked to testify in legal proceeding regarding the release of confidential culture obtained as news source in one of their written articles.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
One common look that addresses a journalist being asked to release confidential information pertaining to a news source is the case of Paul Branzburg in 1971, Branzburg v Hayes (Calbert & Pember, 2005). Branzburg was called to testify after writing cardinal news stories regarding a Kentucky drug deal er and drug dealers in the area (Calbert & P! ember, 2005). The accepted question, should journalists be provided immunity under the first-year Amendment when asked to reveal a news source or should a journalist be held to the same standards as a citizen? In 1972 Justice Byron White, mouth for himself and three other members of the high court stating, “Nor is it suggested that news concourse does not qualify for First Amendment protection; without some...If you want to find out a full essay, invest it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment