Hysan vs Hang Lung Properties

Hysan| 2009| 2008| 2007| 2006| 2005| RoS| 1.92| 1.05| 3.55| 3.00| 4.14| RoE| 8.07| 5.07| 12.48| 11.14| 16.7| RoA| 6.19| 3.84| 9.66| 8.55| 12.12| RoI| 0.06| 0.04| 0.10| 0.09| 0.12| EPS| 2.596| 1.5337| 3.7546| 2.9396| 3.9187| Operating expediency borderline (%) | 72.38 | 68.93 | 322.37| 290.02| 394.83| Pre-tax make headway Margin (%) | 192.44 | 104.95 | 355.41| 299.49 | 414.14| Net Profit Margin (%) | 161.67| 97.31 | 288.67 | 244.36| 329.70| Net Profit return %| 70.39| -59.64| 27.44| -24.8| 577.72| Hang Lung| 2009| 2008| 2007| 2006| 2005| RoS| 2.36| 1.21| 1.20| 2.08| 0.95| RoE| 20.16| 2.44| 12.43| 8.57| 4.65| RoA| 7.95| 0.96| 4.81| 3.21| 1.72| RoI| 0.08| 0.01| 0.05| 0.03| 0.02| EPS| 7.17| 0.68| 3.04| 1.723| 0.82| Operating Profit Margin (%)| 234.68| 120.75| 118.65| 205.54| 47.96| Pre-tax Profit Margin (%) | 235.92| 121.23| 119.57| 207.79| 94.63| Net Profit Margin (%) | 95.91| 39.09| 49.28| 106.93| 42.75| Net Profit Growth %| 958.53| -77.63| 76.31| 110.39| -19.36| Profitability Ratios So how is Hysan doing in comparison to its benchmarking contender Hang Lung Group?

Ratios rather than absolute financial measures be often used for benchmarking. Ratios present financial information in the form of a relative relationship between two absolute measures of performance. This removes the influence that business size has on the measure, do ratios easier to compare and interpret than absolute measures. Appendix XXX knock back XXX are profitability ratios used to show the companies general efficiency and performance in the last 5 years. For some of these values, having a higher value relative to its competitors ratio or its previous years is indicative mood that the company is doing well. For the purpose of our analysis, we will examine the following intravenous feeding profitability measures. Profit Margin Profit... If you want to get a luxuriant essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper