Essay Questions About Japan

Is japan primarily governed by its bureaucracy or by its politicians ExplainIntroductionThe debate centered on the post-WW2 era and onwards . The specific concern discussed by Wright here is the occasion and curve of the bureaucrats and politicians in Japanese insurance policy make . The role of the American preservation cannot be denied in this debate as the discussion on the policies atomic number 18 centered on major issues like subject field security and defence , as well as stack relations and industrial structure and performance - all aspects of which would significantly affect Japan s relationship with America . There are two main thoughts on this debate those of the revisionists who believe that policy making is dominated by the state , particularly , the bureaucrats and the counter-revisionists who argued against this offer , and believe that the politicians dominate policy makingBureaucrats in JapanThe bureaucrats in Japan , specifically , the economic bureaucracy , are actually the players in the MITI and EPA (and later on , the MOF Generally , the task of the bureaucrats is to produce and follow high speed economic growth . According to Wright , this role is explicitly instrumental . It is said that thither are different interest groups who might influence the economic bureaucrats , but basically , they [economic bureaucrats] are the ones who draft almost all legislation , defecate water most decision , control the national budget , and is in like manner the originator of major policy innovations in the system . He also argued that it was the bureaucrats who dominate licensing , foreign currency , and reestablishment of basic industrial structure . Opposing schools agree that the bureaucrats were in fact the ones in charge in the first few years of post-war JapanPoliticians in JapanBefore , the politicians were basically the LDP members - the dominant party in the Japanese law-makers . Politician s role in policy making as argued by counter-revisionists , started to rise when LDP s rule was about to end in 1993 .

Counter-revisionists insisted that whatever might have been the case in the distributor point of high growth , the political system had ) changed , and that the role and influence of politicians in the policy processes had increased (Wright , 945AnalysisThis debate would not consider an agreement /compromise if analyzed on their extremes . However , there are arguments who look at this debate as something that could be looked at in a different perspective . An eccentric is the principal-agent concept on this debate who somehow made a compromise between the two players involved (politicians and bureaucrats . The politicians , being elective by the people , gives the direction of the policy , while the bureaucrats are the ones who are delegate to dot the i s and cross the t s of any policy . They (bureaucrats ) may even be the ones assigned to draft the policy , but still , the politicians get to make the final decision . Another school of thought making a compromise between revisionists and counter-revisionists are those who look at policy making as sectoralized , i .e , there are just some sector of policy making where the bureaucrats are left dominant (like in issues of inflation...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper